In times like these, when the world feels loud, fast, and perpetually online, stillness becomes a quiet act of rebellion. Enter Her Be, Gini Benita, Isabelle Zhao, Jitendra Jerry and Rydel Cerezo: five photographers, five distinct eyes, united by a shared instinct to pause. Partnering with L&rsquo;OFFICIEL HOMMES, they turn their lenses not toward the chaos, but through it, capturing moments of togetherness that feel almost radical in their calm.
The photos are like a hand resting on a shoulder. A glance held a second longer than necessary. These are photographs that breathe, reminding us that connection doesn&rsquo;t disappear just because the world is spinning too fast. Each photographer brings their own rhythm &mdash; soft, sharp, playful, introspective &mdash; but together, they compose a visual conversation about presence, intimacy, and finding your people amid the noise. It&rsquo;s warm without being sentimental. Clever without trying too hard.

There are photographers who chase spectacle. And then there are photographers like Rydel Cerezo, who turn camera inward towards family, faith the quiet friction of being queer, Filipino and, suspended between continents. Born in Baguio City in the Philippines and now based in Vancouver, Cerezo describes himself as a queer Filipino lens-based artist. However, that title barely scratches the surface. His work lives in the minimal:m between sexuality and religion, between domestic tenderness and colonial history, between the Philippines and Canada. If you look closely at his photographs, what you will find is not just portraiture. You will find negotiation, memory, and complicated live by history.
At the centre of his practice is an ongoing investigation into identity, specifically, how it&rsquo;s shaped but religion, race, migration, and lineage. The camera, for Cerezo is a way to enter spaces that might otherwise feel off-limits. It is also a way to gently confront the ones that shaped him. Take the intertwined bodies of work To Be From The Same Tree and Home Sweet Home. Together, they read like a queer love story unfolding across generations, geography, and archives. Homes Sweet Home began not with a new image, but with an old one. While in Belgium, Cerezo encountered the photographic archive of Brother Armand Lammineur, a Belgian Catholic missionary who extensively documented life in Baguio, the very city where Cerezo was born. The coincidence was almost cinematic. At the time, Cerezo was in a long-term relationship with a member of Lammineur&rsquo;s family. The archive wasn&rsquo;t just historical, it was intimate. Suddenly, images of his birthplace, filtered through a colonial missionary lens became entangled with his own love story. The result is a body of work that feels both tender and uneasy. These photographs hold the tension of togetherness. Connection is made possible through love, yes but it is also shadowed by religion, mission, and empire, the visible architectures that shaped that proximity in the first place.
The duality of tenderness and critique runs through everything Cerezo makes. Growing up in the Philippines and later studying in Canada created two distinct visual and intellectual landscapes. His Western education gave him the theoretical language to interrogate archives: Who gets to produce them? Who is preserved? Who is erased? Nevertheless, his Filipino upbringing keeps him tethered to something more embodied; lineage, spirituality, and the weight of domestic space.
For Cerezo, the archive is not sterile. It is personal. &ldquo;My visual identity has been shaped by memory,&rdquo; he explains. He often returns to personal photographic archives as a meeting point, a space where his Filipino and Western experiences converge. That convergence isn&rsquo;t always harmonious. Sometimes it&rsquo;s critique. Sometimes it&rsquo;s belonging. Often it&rsquo;s both.
And then there&rsquo;s vulnerability, the kind that can&rsquo;t be staged. Cerezo&rsquo;s work frequently features people integral to his life: family by blood and family by choice. Photographing those closest to you is an act of trust but it is also inevitably an act of power. A portrait can never fully belong to the sitter alone. The photographer&rsquo;s gaze, his investments and instincts aways shapes it. He is acutely aware of this tension. In fact, he is interested in what he calls the feeling of &ldquo;betrayal&rdquo; that can accompany image-making. Not betrayal in a malicious sense, but in the unavoidable sense that once an image exists, it carries the photographer&rsquo;s authorship. It&rsquo;s a quiet acknowledgment of portraiture&rsquo;s limits. No photograph can fully contain a person. There is always something left out, something misinterpreted, something claimed.
Before he ever lifts the camera, Cerezo prioritises relationship because trust is built slowly, and rapport is earned. The work begins long before the shutter clicks. Vulnerability, for him, often takes precedence over aesthetic ambition. That philosophy became especially poignant during the lockdown period, which gave rise ton wise series Back of My Hand. Created during time of global stillness, the work meditates on proximity, how simply being near someone can transform what we know about them. As immigrants understand all too well, togetherness carries weight when geography separates you from the people you love, and lockdown reframed proximity as precious. For Cerezo, it also exposed how intimacy shapes knowledge. The idiom &ldquo;like the back of my hand&rdquo; suggests familiarity so complete it is unquestionable. However, what if that certainty is fragile? The series wrestles with the uncertainty of truly knowing those closest to us and softly utters that intimacy is not static and it requires unlearning. It requires acknowledging that even in physical closeness, mystery persists.
Community or togetherness, in Cerezo&rsquo;s world, is beautiful but fraught. It&rsquo;s shaped by care, yes, but also by tension. He resists singular narratives. Instead, he&rsquo;s drawn to contradictions: family photographs that conflict with official records, oral histories that challenge institutional archives, personal journals that disrupt linear storytelling. History, he suggests, is malleable. And perhaps that&rsquo;s where his work feels most urgent. In an era obsessed with definitive takes and neat conclusions, Cerezo&rsquo;s photographs linger in ambiguity. They allow multiple truths to coexist.
Of course, being an artist today means navigating the constant pressure to produce, to stay visible, to stay relevant, to keep feeding the algorithm. Cerezo&rsquo;s antidote? Sourdough. Recently, he began learning how to bake bread. The process is gloriously resistant to urgency. A single loaf can take three days. Fermentation cannot be rushed. You feed the starter. You wait. You trust. Something invisible transforms into something sustaining. It&rsquo;s hard not to see the metaphor. In a culture that prizes immediacy, Cerezo is drawn to processes that demand patience. The act of making sourdough becomes less about baking and more about mindfulness, an act of hope that something quiet will eventually rise.

Her Be might be chasing moments, but the truth is they arrive, linger, and leave on their own terms &mdash; and somewhere in that quiet exchange, a photograph happens.
Based in Kuala Lumpur, Her Be is the kind of photographer whose work asks you to slow down before it lets you in. There&rsquo;s no grand reveal, no punchline image screaming for attention. Instead, there&rsquo;s atmosphere. Feeling. A sense that what you&rsquo;re looking at is less a picture and more a state of mind you&rsquo;ve briefly stepped into.
Unlike the usual origin story &mdash; this was the exact moment I knew photography would be my life &mdash; Her Be&rsquo;s relationship with the medium has always been there. &ldquo;It did not emerge at a single moment,&rdquo; they say. &ldquo;It has existed from the very beginning.&rdquo; From the first encounter, photography became a way to express an inner sense of beauty and sensibility &mdash; not a tool to master, but a language to feel through.
For her, photography doesn&rsquo;t begin with form, composition, or rules. It begins with sensation. The image emerges through intuition rather than control, shaped by an internal alignment between what&rsquo;s seen and what&rsquo;s felt. Seeing and framing become extensions of an inner world, inviting resonance rather than recognition. In other words, the image doesn&rsquo;t want to be understood immediately; it wants to be felt.
That philosophy runs through the photographs selected for this project. They resist linear storytelling, refusing to spoon-feed narrative or meaning. Instead, the images unfold like an emotional constellation &mdash; fragments of a singular inner state scattered across time. Think less beginning-middle-end, more suspended presence. Together, they form an open emotional field. Not a conclusion. Not an answer. Just a moment that stays with you.
Beauty, in Her Be&rsquo;s world, is never loud. It&rsquo;s something that reveals itself slowly, through perception and patience. Their personal journey taught them to trust their own sensibility and allow it space to develop without rushing towards validation. Beauty remains deeply personal; however, when expression is sustained with coherence and care, it begins to resonate beyond the self &mdash; quietly, naturally.
There&rsquo;s a reason Her Be&rsquo;s images often feel intimate yet expansive, as if they belong to both the photographer and the viewer. That balance comes from a deep commitment to authenticity. Whether capturing the atmosphere of a space or the emotional undercurrent of a subject, the focus remains on what is genuinely unfolding in the moment. No embellishment. No performance. Just the raw, unfiltered reality of being there. Authenticity, they believe, is what allows emotional resonance to travel outward.
In moments of creative chaos &mdash; which, let&rsquo;s be honest, is most of the time &mdash; Her Be doesn&rsquo;t run from the noise. She sits with it. In an era oversaturated with inspiration, information, and pressure, chaos becomes something to listen to rather than escape. Creativity, then, becomes a form of inward return. Not a refuge exactly, not a mirror either, but a quiet dialogue with the self, led by intuition.
That same intuition shapes how togetherness appears in her work. There&rsquo;s no forced symbolism, no overt declaration of connection. Togetherness isn&rsquo;t constructed, but allowed. It emerges through presence, openness, and an emotional exchange between lens and subject. Details fall into place naturally when the connection is real. The image holds that alignment without needing to explain itself.
Even in editorial and fashion contexts, where creative voices often get diluted, Her Be maintains a clear artistic centre. Collaboration, for her, is about balance. Brands and publications bring their essence; Her Be translates it through her own lens. The result isn&rsquo;t compromise, but alignment &mdash; a shared space where authenticity can still breathe.
Light, both literal and metaphorical, plays a quiet but crucial role. Her Be is drawn to light with layers &mdash; unpredictable, fleeting, present only in that exact moment. She doesn&rsquo;t try to dominate it or engineer perfection. Instead, she stays attentive to how light interacts with the subject, revealing different emotional textures. Natural light and direct flash become fortes, as both allow depth to surface organically.
In a visual world drowning in images, Her Be hopes for one simple thing when someone pauses on her photograph: a pause. Not instant understanding. Not clarity. Just a brief suspension &mdash; a moment of attentiveness before meaning forms. If there&rsquo;s a feeling, it should arrive as quiet recognition, something familiar yet undefined. The image is meant to be felt before it&rsquo;s read. In that pause, the photograph shifts from consumption to presence, inviting the viewer to remain not just with the image, but with themselves.
Over time, her understanding of community has shifted too. Togetherness is no longer about representation or proximity, but presence &mdash; a shared state that emerges when photographer, subject, and space align. Community reveals itself through attention and duration. A photograph becomes a temporary convergence of beings.
Looking ahead, Her Be isn&rsquo;t chasing novelty. Her curiosity points inward, towards fundamentals. Towards deeper, more essential emotional states. The next chapter isn&rsquo;t about new places or louder themes, but about allowing inner languages to fully unfold without restraint, without hurry.
And in a culture obsessed with instant impact, that might be the most radical move of all.

Jerry doesn&rsquo;t announce themselves loudly. They don&rsquo;t need to. The work does that just fine.
Born Jitendra Bhagavatula and self-renamed Jerry &mdash; because, in their words, they find themselves funny &mdash; the non-binary photographer comes from Kuchipudi, a small village in Andhra Pradesh, India. It&rsquo;s a detail that matters, not as a humble-brag origin story, but as a grounding force. Jerry&rsquo;s images feel rooted even when they look global, intimate even when they&rsquo;re fashion-forward. There&rsquo;s no spectacle for spectacle&rsquo;s sake. Just people, seen clearly.
A graduate of NIT Warangal and now represented by ALF, Jerry&rsquo;s practice moves fluidly between fashion, culture, documentary, styling, portraiture, and long-form projects. However, categories don&rsquo;t really stick. What anchors everything is feeling. &ldquo;When a photograph feels true, I approve it internally as Jerry,&rdquo; they say. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s when I know it&rsquo;s real, honest, and exactly how I intended it to be.&rdquo; Jerry doesn&rsquo;t just shoot images; in fact, they listen to them.
Photography, for Jerry, is less about control and more about surrender. They describe the act of shooting as meditative, guided by how they feel about the subject rather than imposing a rigid vision. Identity, self-love, and belonging are recurring themes, but never in a didactic way. Instead, they unfold quietly in posture, styling, silence, skin.
Take the images of Khushi Rathee, styled by Blake Samson, a German stylist based in Mumbai. Shot on analogue film, the photographs explore how Indian skin is perceived through a Western styling lens. Jerry is fascinated by that tension: how an outside eye notices details locals might overlook. It&rsquo;s not about East versus West, but about what happens when those perspectives meet and soften. Then there&rsquo;s the work with Shwetha and Tarun for NorBlack NorWhite, one of India&rsquo;s most culturally sharp fashion brands. The label is known for exploring the grey spaces of identity, and fittingly, the styling was done by Shwetha herself. The result feels lived-in, unpolished in the best way. Authenticity isn&rsquo;t styled here; it&rsquo;s worn.
Jerry&rsquo;s photobook, Who Am I?!, is perhaps the clearest distillation of their ethos. A portrait of Rem from the project strips identity down to its emotional core &mdash; self-reflection without performance. The project itself is rooted in style, art, and fashion, but more importantly, voice. It centres people often overlooked in Indian fashion media, creating space rather than extracting stories. &ldquo;I approach collaboration by giving my subjects freedom to exist as they are,&rdquo; Jerry explains. It&rsquo;s a simple philosophy, and a radical one.
That openness extends to Jerry&rsquo;s other subjects, too. Seerat Saini, a Punjabi-American influencer photographed during her time in Mumbai, caught Jerry&rsquo;s attention not just for her look, but her voice &mdash; clear, confident, unafraid. Amit Malhotra, book designer and co-founder of Gul Sohrab Studio, appears wearing garments from his own brand, blending multiple Indian textiles. To Jerry, this isn&rsquo;t just personal style; it&rsquo;s a glimpse of where Indian fashion is headed: layered, thoughtful, and unbothered by rigid definitions.
Ikisvon Jamang, a fashion influencer from Northeast India now based in Delhi, is another favourite. Effortless, expressive, deeply individual &mdash; qualities Jerry gravitates towards instinctively. And then there&rsquo;s Ayesha Kanga, actor and creative, one of Mumbai&rsquo;s most exciting boundary-pushers, constantly experimenting with fashion and gently disrupting Bollywood&rsquo;s visual codes. Jerry doesn&rsquo;t mythologise these figures; they simply meet them where they are.
Silence plays a crucial role in that meeting. Jerry tends to speak very little during shoots, especially in personal projects. In that quiet, something shifts. &ldquo;The photographs often carry the energy of what&rsquo;s left unspoken between me and the person in front of the camera,&rdquo; they say. What emerges is often more honest, and more surprising, than the first impression. It&rsquo;s the difference between looking and seeing.
This sensitivity may trace back to Jerry&rsquo;s roots. Growing up in a village meant growing up close to textiles, craft, and a self-sustaining way of life. Beauty wasn&rsquo;t something curated for a screen; it existed in everyday details. That grounding still shapes how Jerry photographs India today, across cities, communities, and subcultures. Culture, after all, isn&rsquo;t confined to institutions. It lives in gestures, fabric, conversations, and bodies moving through space.
Jerry is also acutely aware of what&rsquo;s missing in Indian fashion media. Much of it remains Bollywood-centric, narrowing how fashion is seen and understood. &ldquo;What I see around me feels global, yet rooted here,&rdquo; they say. Their work aims to bridge that gap &mdash; to place Indian fashion within a global conversation without flattening its complexity.
In a world that feels increasingly fragmented, Jerry&rsquo;s photographs offer quiet proof that connection still exists. Through friends, communities, and strangers, through shared style and unspoken understanding, togetherness keeps finding its way into the frame. Not forced. Not filtered. Just present.
And maybe that&rsquo;s Jerry&rsquo;s real signature: the ability to make space for identity, for softness, for people to be exactly who they are. No control. No imposition. Just the truth, approved internally.

There&rsquo;s a particular kind of calm in Gili Benita&rsquo;s photographs. Not the loud, look-at-me kind of beauty, but the quieter sort &mdash; the kind that asks you to lean in, lower your voice, and stay a little longer than you planned. It&rsquo;s intimacy without spectacle, tenderness without theatrics. And it makes sense once you hear where he comes from.
Benita is a New York&ndash;based photographer by way of a small town near Jerusalem, where cameras, conflict, and closeness coexisted early in his life. Photography entered his world the way most lifelong passions do: accidentally, playfully, almost illegally. &ldquo;My dad was a video journalist,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;When I was around 12, I used to steal his camera.&rdquo; He&rsquo;d bring it to school, photograph his friends, document whatever caught his eye. No manifesto, no master plan &mdash; just curiosity and access.
Things sharpened in high school, where he studied cinema and learned that images don&rsquo;t just show things; they do things. They move people. They shape feelings. They carry responsibility. Growing up in a geographically and politically charged environment, where breaking news felt like background noise, taught him early on that visual storytelling wasn&rsquo;t neutral. It mattered. And maybe, in small ways, it could change something &mdash; or someone.
That sense of care runs through Shinmitsu (2024), his recent series created in collaboration with Emma Schwarz. Shot in Japan, the project explores intimacy within a culture often associated with restraint. The title nods to closeness, and the images deliver: lovers curled into each other, friends sharing quiet proximity, families spanning generations. What Benita is really photographing, though, is the space between what we show the world and what we keep for ourselves. In Japanese terms, it&rsquo;s the tension between tatemae, the public face, and honne, the private truth.
&ldquo;For me, the power of togetherness is that moment where you&rsquo;re stripped of performance,&rdquo; he explains. &ldquo;You can show your most sincere version to someone else, and be met with love and acceptance.&rdquo; Working on the series deepened his understanding of others, yet it also reframed his own relationships &mdash; with his partner, with his family, with friends he now sees more clearly.
His visual language &mdash; soft light, muted colour, composed restraint &mdash; owes a lot to contrast. Jerusalem, he says, isn&rsquo;t so different from New York. Both are diverse, hectic, and strangely warm. Both hold joy and fear in the same breath. &ldquo;First love, adolescence, deep friendships &mdash; many times they were intertwined with war and unrest,&rdquo; he says. That push and pull shaped his instinct to turn the camera inward, towards people and connection, when the outside world feels like it&rsquo;s fraying.
Benita is fascinated by what he calls our dual personalities: the curated social self and the private, unfiltered one. Photography, for him, is a way to gently dismantle the former in search of the latter. He gravitates towards moments where that mask slips, where body language, proximity, or silence tells a truer story than words ever could.
In Shinmitsu, that truth transcends language. Listening to his subjects talk about how they met, where they came from, and what shaped them became as important as the images themselves. Each detail, he says, felt like a brick in a shared sanctuary &mdash; fragile, but strong &mdash; built from time, trauma, laughter, and endurance. &ldquo;Even though it was photographed in Japan,&rdquo; he reflects, &ldquo;it showed me something completely universal: connection is what keeps us going.&rdquo;
Of course, photographing vulnerability comes with its own tightrope. Benita is acutely aware of the power dynamic at play. Being invited into someone&rsquo;s private space is a privilege, not a right. &ldquo;If they open up to me, I should open up to them too,&rdquo; he says. Trust has to be mutual. Often, he finds himself listening more than shooting, holding space like a quiet confidant. &ldquo;Sometimes I feel like a therapist,&rdquo; he admits, half-smiling. The photographs matter &mdash; but not more than the people in them.
When the noise of the world gets overwhelming, he returns to simplicity. A camera in his bag. No deadlines. No posting. Just photographing his partner, their dog, friends, family &mdash; images made for no one but themselves. In an age where everyone has an iPhone, the deliberate act of using a &ldquo;real&rdquo; camera feels grounding. Intentional. Fun again.&nbsp;
Togetherness, in his work, isn&rsquo;t limited to romance or companionship. It can be solitude too &mdash; being fully present with yourself. Still, he&rsquo;s honest about the effort connection requires. Vulnerability isn&rsquo;t passive. It&rsquo;s work. Visually, he looks for its traces: a hand resting nearby, the distance between bodies, light bouncing softly around a shared space, as if the environment itself is participating in the relationship.
Light, for Benita, serves as a protection &mdash; an envelope that holds vulnerability without exposing it. He favours natural, ambient softness, light that lets you feel the atmosphere before you notice the details. It mirrors his own life, where soft colours and calm spaces help him slow down and invite others to do the same.
Looking ahead, his curiosity is turning towards family &mdash; connections stretched across decades, layered with trauma, inside jokes, boredom, and joy. He&rsquo;s also eager to expand beyond photography, to collaborate, to let storytelling take new shapes.
If there&rsquo;s a through-line in Gili Benita&rsquo;s work, it&rsquo;s this: in a world addicted to noise and performance, he&rsquo;s choosing quiet, care, and closeness. Not as an escape, but as a reminder of what&rsquo;s worth holding onto.

Raised in the American Midwest by two pragmatic immigrant parents, photography was never presented to Isabelle as a viable future, but more like a pleasant hobby you quietly outgrow. Sensible jobs were encouraged. Stability was the goal. Then, in 2020, the world cracked open. &ldquo;All our illusions of stability flew out the window,&rdquo; she says. In the chaos of the pandemic, Isabelle arrived at a simple, liberating conclusion: the world&rsquo;s gone to pieces; I may as well pursue what I love.
Now based in Brooklyn, Isabelle is a self-taught photographer whose work hums with intimacy, tenderness, and a stubborn belief in beauty. Her images don&rsquo;t shout. They linger. They sit with you. They ask a gentle but insistent question: who do you belong to, and where?
Togetherness is the through-line of the photographs she&rsquo;s selected for this project. Siblings, lovers, friends, shared cultural ties &mdash; each image explores connection from a different angle, but the emotional request is the same: belonging. Somewhere, with someone. It&rsquo;s one of the most fundamental human needs, Isabelle notes, and a quiet force behind how we move through the world. There is nothing dramatic about her photographs, but they are always intertwined with intimacy and authenticity that invite viewers to pause and look.
That sensitivity has been shaped by geography as much as experience. Moving from the Midwest to Brooklyn was, of course, a change of scenery, but also a reckoning. When Isabelle first arrived in New York, she tried hard to shed her Midwestern identity. Her hometown hadn&rsquo;t been an easy place to grow up, and like many young creatives, she was determined to &ldquo;make it&rdquo; in the city. That first year, she admits, she mimicked dominant fashion and editorial aesthetics without stopping to ask whether those images actually felt like her.
The irony? It didn&rsquo;t work.
&ldquo;It wasn&rsquo;t until I let go of relevance and made images I felt deep in my own bones that my work began to receive recognition,&rdquo; she says. Authenticity, it turns out, has better timing than trend-chasing.
Today, Isabelle has made peace with being many things at once: the immigrant, the American, the transplant. She knows she can walk into spaces where no one looks like her, strike up conversations, and find common ground. Home exists in multiple forms &mdash; on a farm, working with her hands; in the smell of jiaozi boiling on the stove; in the electric hum of her Bed-Stuy neighbourhood. That emotional patchwork shows up in her work as a collage of worlds loved deeply and simultaneously.
At one point, Isabelle described herself as a former pessimist who now treats image-making as &ldquo;an insistence on beauty.&rdquo; The shift didn&rsquo;t happen overnight. She&rsquo;s long been drawn to photographing intimacy, which feels almost ironic given that she grew up in an environment where it was scarce. As a teenager, photography became a way to look beyond the limits of her own life. If I can photograph it, then it exists, she thought. Beauty, in that sense, was defiant.
Stillness, however, didn&rsquo;t come naturally. Isabelle laughs at the idea. Her work, she says, represents her at her most aspirational. Behind the camera, the vulnerability of her subject becomes sacred. That sense of responsibility forces her to slow down, to be calm, clear-eyed, and present, even when her inner world is anything but. The lens becomes a discipline rather than just a tool.
That discipline is what gives her photographs their quietly human quality, even when there&rsquo;s no obvious narrative. Empathy, for Isabelle, is a practice. She believes her growth as an artist is inseparable from her growth as a person. Photography forces her to question assumptions, to lead with curiosity, to sit with people rather than categorise them. Each image becomes a form of introspection. The ultimate goal, she says, is to live that way beyond the camera, too.
One of the most powerful lessons she&rsquo;s learned is that beauty can exist where she once only saw chaos or banality. And that realisation often starts internally, as a conversation with herself rather than a judgement of others. She recalls photographing an emotionally charged protest at New York&rsquo;s federal ICE offices. The images felt urgent, but also familiar &mdash; too familiar. Every day, feeds are flooded with devastation and cruelty, and she felt the pull towards despair.
That moment clarified something important: those images weren&rsquo;t her calling. Her work lives on the other side of the conversation.
After the protest, Isabelle travelled across the country, photographing and speaking with progressive Americans resisting Trump&rsquo;s presidency in deeply conservative, rural towns. The one-on-one kitchen-table conversations she had there &mdash; quiet, complex, human &mdash; were far more hopeful than the news had suggested. Political despair in America is real, she says. But so is hope.
Perhaps that belief is why community has become one of the sweetest surprises of her career. Isabelle entered photography expecting posturing, performativity, and gatekeeping, especially as someone who didn&rsquo;t go to art school or grow up in New York. Instead, she found mentors, collaborators, editors, and friends who were generous, grounded, and passionate. She landed in what she calls &ldquo;a soft place&rdquo; in the city.
No reinvention required. No performance necessary. Just the freedom to be herself, and to insist, again and again, on beauty.

5 Photographers on Finding Calm in a World That Won’t Slow Down

Recommended posts for you

Hommes

Salomon Reworks Its XT Legacy With the New XT-EVO

Culture

Life After Work? Discover Manila’s New Third Places That Aren’t Just Bars

Fashion

Thinking of a Wardrobe Refresh? Start at Regatta’s New Flagship

Beauty

Is Beauty Becoming Genderless?

Fashion

Jin, Kate Moss, Shawn Mendes, and More Star in Gucci’s New Primavera Campaign

Hommes

Sexy Scents to Wear Into September

Culture

Your Guide to the Manila International Book Fair 2026

Beauty

Local Beauty Brands to Shop for Your Next Signature Scent